Mutton, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 33-60). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Perceived similarity and you may matchmaking achievement one of dating partners: A keen idiographic means
Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Young, J. (2008). In the event the I am not hot, are you presently hot or otherwise not?: Physical-elegance critiques and you will matchmaking tastes since the a purpose of one’s own elegance. Psychological Technology, 19, 669677. [ Links ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in-marriage or other romantic relationship. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of ambition. From inside the J. McV. Look (Ed.), Identity in addition to choices conditions (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Force. [ Hyperlinks ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship relationship fate which have insiders’ and outsiders’ direction: Exactly who and you can what’s requested things. Individual Relationship, 13, 349-362. [ Links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can marital quality inside the newlyweds: Two centered method. Record regarding Identity and you can Social Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Hyperlinks ]
Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, An effective. (2006). Dating. Arizona, DC: Statement into the Pew Sites & Western Lives Endeavor. Recovered , out of [ Links ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the precision from predictions regarding the dating dating: How and exactly why would lovers’ forecasts vary from those created by observers? Personality and you may Social Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Links ]
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing activities on the initiation out of heterosexual dating. Paper showed on First In the world Appointment to your Personal Relationship, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, E.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.Good. (2000). Electronic relationship and you may digital linked: Conceptualizing desktop mediated romantic dating. Family unit members, forty two, 187-192. [ Links ]
Montoya, Roentgen. Yards., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was real similarity very important to attraction? Good meta-investigation from real and you can perceived resemblance. Record out-of Personal and personal Matchmaking, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Links ]
Morry, M. Meters. (2005). Matchmaking satisfaction as the good predictor from resemblance reviews; A test of your own attraction-resemblance theory. Diary out of Social and private Relationships, 22, 561-584. [ Website links ]
Diary regarding Social and private Matchmaking, 23, 865-880
Morry, Meters. Meters. (2007). The new attraction-resemblance hypothesis one of get across-sex members of the family: Relationships fulfillment, understood similarities, and care about-offering attitudes. Record away from Personal and private Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you will extension of your SVR theory out-of dyadic pairing. Log regarding ily, 49, 929-947. [ Backlinks ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who will divorce: An effective fourteen-12 months longitudinal study of black lovers and white partners. Diary regarding Personal and personal Relationship, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]
Orenstein, S. (). New like formula Suits believes it has receive a formula for ruling the web relationship company: A scientific strategy to find Mr. or Ms. Correct. Team dos.0 Mag. Retrieved to the out of [ Backlinks ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Precisely the congruent survive – Character similarities within the partners. Identity and you may Individual https://internationalwomen.net/sv/filippinska-kvinnor/ Distinctions, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner tastes: Just what services do group appeal within short-identity sexual and you may long-name personal partners? Record out-of Mindset and you may Individual Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Backlinks ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest role of your self throughout the initiation and you can course of public communications. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you may in conflict dating (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]
